Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589182›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A neuromorphic model of active vision shows how spatiotemporal encoding in lobula neurons can aid pattern recognition in bees.

HaDi MaBouDi, Mark Roper, Marie-Geneviève Guiraud, Mikko Juusola, Lars Chittka, James A R Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

HaDi MaBouDiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-6465
Mark RoperSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1135-6187
Marie-Geneviève GuiraudSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-9188
Mikko JuusolaSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4428-5330
Lars ChittkaSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-1732
James A R MarshallDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-167X

Funding

Australian Research Council DP210100740Australian Research Council DP230100006Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F012071/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X006247/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Poo6094/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/X019705/1HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme NimbleAIHuman Frontier Science Program RGP0022/2014Leverhulme Trust RPG-2024-016TWCF 10.54224/20539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bees' remarkable visual learning abilities make them ideal for studying active information acquisition and representation. Here, we develop a biologically inspired model to examine how flight behaviours during visual scanning shape neural representation in the insect brain, exploring the interplay between scanning behaviour, neural connectivity, and visual encoding efficiency. Incorporating non-associative learning-adaptive changes without reinforcement-and exposing the model to sequential natural images during scanning, we obtain results that closely match neurobiological observations. Active scanning and non-associative learning dynamically shape neural activity, optimising information flow and representation. Lobula neurons, crucial for visual integration, self-organise into orientation-selective cells with sparse, decorrelated responses to orthogonal bar movements. They encode a range of orientations, biased by input speed and contrast, suggesting co-evolution with scanning behaviour to enhance visual representation and support efficient coding. To assess the significance of this spatiotemporal coding, we extend the model with circuitry analogous to the mushroom body, a region linked to associative learning. The model demonstrates robust performance in pattern recognition, implying a similar encoding mechanism in insects. Integrating behavioural, neurobiological, and computational insights, this study highlights how spatiotemporal coding in the lobula efficiently compresses visual features, offering broader insights into active vision strategies and bio-inspired automation.

Indexed as

NeuronsPattern Recognition, VisualVision, OcularAnimalsBeesLearningModels, Neurologicalcomputational biologyimage statisticslobulamushroom bodiesnon-associative learningnonescanning behavioursystems biologyvisual recognition

Identifiers

PMID40589182
PMCPMC12212919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.