ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2025
Social egg freezing among single females: Middle Eastern point of view.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autonomy under pressure: a scoping review of social egg freezing in the bottom quintile of the gender gap index.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the beliefs, barriers, and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation in Jordanian females. Understanding these aspects in our region can help healthcare providers identify similarities and differences compared to other geographic areas, which could facilitate a proper approach and informed counseling.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey using Google® forms (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA). The questions were designed to target a convenience sample of single women (never married, divorced, or widowed) aged 18-64 years in Jordan. Of the 400 women approached, 345 completed the questionnaire voluntarily. Responses were collected and analyzed using the software program SPSS® 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsThe.
resultshighlight notable deficiencies in women's understanding of the expenses, procedures, and success rates of oocyte freezing as a feasible method for fertility preservation. Most participants stated that the main barriers to oocyte cryopreservation were cost (87.5%), future husband rejection (76.8%), and social exclusion (72.2%). However, a significant number of participants admitted that this procedure would encourage late marriage and increase the chance of pregnancy in cases of late marriage and fertility problems.
conclusionWomen in this study had poor knowledge, but generally had positive attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation. Educational campaigns are warranted to enhance knowledge and positive attitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.