Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40589059›Full record

ArticleJournal of chest surgery2025

Preliminary Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resected Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan.

Chia Liu, Yi-Chen Yeh, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, Han-Shui Hsu, Po-Kuei Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Adjuvant immunotherapyFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chia LiuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0284-3570
Yi-Chen YehSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6442-4967
Ling-I ChienDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4745-7114
Chien-Sheng HuangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-2869
Han-Shui HsuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-1626
Po-Kuei HsuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-0227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The CheckMate 577 trial demonstrated that adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival in patients with resected esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes associated with adjuvant immunotherapy. Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer and residual pathological disease who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection between January 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were grouped by adjuvant treatment received: no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant immunotherapy (AI), or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients meeting CheckMate 577 eligibility criteria and those with pathological node-positive (ypN+) status. Results: The study included 127 patients (mean age: 60 years; male: 86%): 23 received AI, 36 AC, and 68 received no adjuvant therapy. There were no significant differences in OS between AI and AC groups (median OS [mOS]: 34 months vs. 34 months; p=0.81), nor in RFS (median RFS [mRFS]: 15 months vs. 16 months; p=0.94). In the CheckMate 577-eligible subgroup (n=68), OS and RFS were similar between AI and AC groups (mOS: 25 months vs. 47 months; p=0.16; mRFS: 19 months vs. 20 months; p=0.74). Likewise, among ypN+ patients (n=54), no significant differences in OS or RFS were noted between AI and AC (mOS: 34 months vs. 31 months; p=0.74; mRFS: 9.5 months vs. 14 months; p=0.89). Conclusion: AI did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to AC, even in patients meeting CheckMate 577 criteria or those with ypN+ status. Identifying the optimal adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer remains a challenging and evolving issue.

Indexed as

Adjuvant immunotherapyEsophageal neoplasmsResidual neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40589059
PMCPMC12230691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.