ArticleJournal of chest surgery2025
Preliminary Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resected Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan.
Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adjuvant immunotherapyFrontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Adjuvant Immunotherapy Improves Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy: A Multicenter Real-World Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell Carcinoma: Results from ESO-Shanghai 17 and joint analyses for phase II clinical trials.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Commentary: Real-World Insights into Adjuvant Immunotherapy after Esophagectomy.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The CheckMate 577 trial demonstrated that adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival in patients with resected esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes associated with adjuvant immunotherapy. Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer and residual pathological disease who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection between January 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were grouped by adjuvant treatment received: no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant immunotherapy (AI), or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients meeting CheckMate 577 eligibility criteria and those with pathological node-positive (ypN+) status. Results: The study included 127 patients (mean age: 60 years; male: 86%): 23 received AI, 36 AC, and 68 received no adjuvant therapy. There were no significant differences in OS between AI and AC groups (median OS [mOS]: 34 months vs. 34 months; p=0.81), nor in RFS (median RFS [mRFS]: 15 months vs. 16 months; p=0.94). In the CheckMate 577-eligible subgroup (n=68), OS and RFS were similar between AI and AC groups (mOS: 25 months vs. 47 months; p=0.16; mRFS: 19 months vs. 20 months; p=0.74). Likewise, among ypN+ patients (n=54), no significant differences in OS or RFS were noted between AI and AC (mOS: 34 months vs. 31 months; p=0.74; mRFS: 9.5 months vs. 14 months; p=0.89). Conclusion: AI did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to AC, even in patients meeting CheckMate 577 criteria or those with ypN+ status. Identifying the optimal adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer remains a challenging and evolving issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.