Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588805›Full record

ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Equity and Inclusion in Assessing Hereditary Cancer Risk: Insights From Excluded Communities, Structured Interviews, and Population Genetics.

Janis Geary, Lynette Hammond Gerido, Amanda M Gutierrez, Kali J Dale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janis GearyArizona State University, Barrett & O'Connor Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-8713
Lynette Hammond GeridoCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2243-6203
Amanda M GutierrezArizona State University, Barrett & O'Connor Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-5328
Kali J DaleNative BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, SD, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-0558-7344

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Amar Desai · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
The Sulston Project: making the knowledge commons for interpreting cancer genomic variants more effectiveR01CA237118 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI COOK-DEEGAN, ROBERT MULLAN, MCGUIRE, AMY L · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
University of Michigan Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG010030 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$962k
NCI NIH HHS L60 CA274876NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237118NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Including underrepresented population groups in databases and initiatives integral to assessing hereditary cancer risk presents several challenges. Data and knowledge from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and clinical genomics are based largely on people with predominantly European ancestry. Individuals who do not have this ancestry are under-represented in resources used to make clinical assessments. They are therefore more likely to receive results of "variant of unknown significance" (VUS) from genetic testing. Efforts to broaden representation of population groups have created additional challenges in grouping those with mixed ancestry. Further, the focus on genetics can lead to downplaying the impacts of racism. We describe challenges that must be overcome to include underrepresented population groups, including our insights from our ongoing work within each of 3 population groups that focus on: health care access for heterogeneous Hispanic/Latino populations, engagement with Black, African, and African Diasporic  communities, and Indigenous Data sovereignty. Using empirical data derived from population databases, we demonstrate gaps in hereditary cancer gene variant representation. Our interviews with experts in genetic testing and data sharing suggest ways to create inclusive hereditary cancer data resources. The interview data highlight the inequities that have led to underrepresentation, ranging from patient access to research and health services (especially those that are culturally-sensitive), to funding available for professional training and grants to those who belong to underrepresented groups. Our goal is to ensure the realities of how different excluded groups experience genetic testing are not overlooked in the development of policy to address the broad challenge of hereditary cancer gene variant data sharing. There is no one simple solution to making more inclusive hereditary cancer data resources, but there are many opportunities to improve them and better serve these populations.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, PopulationNeoplasmsGenetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansaccess to carecommunity engagementdata sovereigntyequity/inclusiongenetic testingpolicy

Identifiers

PMID40588805
PMCPMC12209571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.