Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588731›Full record

SynthesisVirology journal2025

Causal relationship between COVID-19, vaccination, and 20 digestive diseases: a comprehensive two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Xin Zeng, Xiang Li, Yansong Fu, Jie Chen, Keyi Yang, Hong Qin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin Zeng *Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410128, China.
Xiang Li *Department of Emergency Medicine, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, 410005, China.
Yansong FuXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410128, China.
Jie ChenXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410128, China.
Keyi YangXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410128, China.
Hong QinXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410128, China. qinhong@csu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4578-5118

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequelae and complications have become a significant concern in the post-pandemic era of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it remains unclear whether there is a direct causal relationship between COVID-19 or vaccination and digestive diseases, as existing evidence is ambiguous and controversial. In this study, we investigated the associations between multiple COVID-19 infection phenotypes, vaccination, and 20 common digestive diseases, and explored their causal relationships through extensive Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

methodsFor individuals of European descent, we conducted an extensive two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. Six COVID-19 infection (six phenotypes) GWAS datasets and two vaccination (from the UK and Finland) GWAS datasets were used as exposure factors; 20 common digestive diseases were treated as outcome factors, with each disease having two or more GWAS datasets, mostly sourced from the UK Biobank and FinnGene platforms. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the exposures were used as instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate the causal relationship between COVID-19, vaccination, and the 20 digestive diseases. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the combined causal effect from multiple MR results.

resultsMR analysis revealed a causal relationship between COVID-19 and duodenal ulcer (P = 4.98E-03, OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00). Additionally, COVID-19 hospitalization was associated with viral hepatitis (P = 4.94E-02, OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.21), cirrhosis (P = 1.72E-02, OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.98), and chronic pancreatitis (P = 1.48E-02, OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98). Severe COVID-19 infection was linked to viral hepatitis (P = 3.57E-02, OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00), cholelithiasis (P = 3.50E-02, OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00), and Crohn's disease (P = 4.15E-02, OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00). Meta-analysis further supported a causal link between COVID-19 and duodenal ulcer (P = 4.97E-03, OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00), gastroesophageal reflux disease (P = 3.38E-02, OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07), and chronic pancreatitis (P = 2.67E-03, OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97). COVID-19 vaccination (Finland) was associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (P = 3.38E-02, OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24). After applying the Benjamini-Hochberg correction, no significant differences were observed in the meta-analysis results.

conclusionsThis extensive MR study found no strong causal relationship between COVID-19 infection, vaccination, and 20 common digestive diseases based on genetic data. These results help clarify the longstanding uncertainty surrounding the potential causal links between COVID-19-related factors and digestive diseases. Our findings suggest that genetic variants associated with COVID-19 infection and vaccination do not significantly influence the risk of these diseases, which could inform clinical treatment strategies and public health guidelines.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDigestive System DiseasesVaccinationFinlandGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSARS-CoV-2United KingdomCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID−19Digestive diseasesMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID40588731
PMCPMC12207808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.