ReviewPain and therapy2025
Neurotransmitter Imbalance in Tension-Type Headache: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache: systematic review and network meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of clinical efficacy of different exercise therapies in the treatment of chronic nonspecific neck pain: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Driving Mechanisms and Future Trends of Migraine and Tension-Type Headache Burden in G20 Countries: A Comparative Analysis Utilizing Decomposition Analysis and Explainable Machine Learning.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Association between calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in saliva and pulp according to anxiety levels in patients with dental pain: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTension-type headache (TTH) is the most prevalent primary headache disorder worldwide, yet its neurobiological underpinnings remain partially understood. Neurotransmitter and neuropeptide alterations have been proposed as contributing factors, but evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review aims to synthesize the available evidence on peripheral and central neurotransmitter alterations in patients with TTH, and to identify potential neurochemical targets for future investigation.
methodsWe searched PubMed and Embase (Ovid) for studies reporting levels of neurotransmitters or neuropeptides in human samples from individuals with TTH. A total of 30 studies were included. Data on study design, sample type, and measured neuromodulators were extracted and narratively synthesized.
resultsNo single neurotransmitter or neuropeptide emerged as a consistent biomarker or central mediator of TTH. However, some systems showed recurring alterations. Substance P levels were elevated in both salivary and platelet samples. Findings on endogenous opioids were mixed, with β-endorphins often reduced and methionine-enkephalin (MET) elevated, possibly reflecting compensatory responses. Serotonin data were heterogeneous and inconclusive, whereas nitric oxide may play a role in headache induction, independent of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP).
conclusionsDespite variability in results, substance P, endogenous opioids, and nitric oxide emerged as the most promising targets for further studies. Future research should prioritize standardized methodologies to clarify the role of these pathways in TTH pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.