ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Participatory approaches in the development of AI applications in medicine: opportunities and challenges].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare not only holds the potential for efficiency gains, personalized medicine, and evidence-based decisions but also raises ethical and social challenges, such as bias, lack of transparency, and acceptance. Participatory approaches that actively involve patients, physicians, caregivers, and other stakeholders in the development process make it possible to align technological innovations with actual needs and to design them in a socially just way.The analysis distinguishes between participation as active co-design and partaking as access to social resources. Theoretical models such as the "ladder of participation" (Arnstein) illustrate the different levels of participation. In addition, methodological approaches such as action research, community-based participatory research, ethics by design, and value-sensitive design are discussed, which promote early ethical reflection and continuous user feedback.Practical examples such as KIPA (AI-supported patient information), KIDELIR (delirium prevention in care), and PRIVETDIS (neurotechnologies and mental privacy) show how participatory research can contribute to the optimization of care concepts. In addition to opportunities such as increased acceptance and user-centered technology design, challenges are identified, including limited resources, lack of representativeness, and invisible additional burdens for those involved. Finally, it is emphasized that in addition to technical and regulatory measures, continuous ethical reflection and transparent communication are essential to implement trustworthy and effective AI systems in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.