ArticleBiogerontology2025
Synbiotic supplementation enhances memory processes in adult and aged male rats.
Article in Biogerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immuno-Glial Connectome in Alzheimer's Disease: Integrating Central and Peripheral Inflammatory Networks.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Neuroplasticity and the microbiome: how microorganisms influence brain change.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synbiotic formulations, which combine prebiotics and probiotics in their composition, have shown promise in improving brain function and cognitive performance. However, the mechanisms by which synbiotics exert their beneficial effects on memory processes, particularly in the context of aging, remain unclear. In the present study, we investigated the effects of synbiotics supplementation on memory updating (reversal learning) and extinction in adult and aged rats. We also assessed the impact of the synbiotic intervention on the gut microbiota composition, diversity, and metabolism. The results showed that synbiotic supplementation (fructooligosaccharide and L. acidophilus, L. bulgaricius, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, and B. bifidum) improved memory updating in adult rats but not in aged rats. In contrast, the synbiotic facilitated memory extinction in aged rats, but not in adults. Interestingly, these cognitive benefits were not accompanied by significant alterations in the gut microbiome. This suggests that the synbiotic's effects on memory processes were mediated through more direct mechanisms, such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuromodulatory actions, rather than through broad changes to the gut microbial community. These findings highlight the potential of synbiotic interventions to ameliorate age-related cognitive impairment and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of the gut-brain axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40588611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.