ArticleBehavior research methods2025
The Pictures by Category and Similarity (PiCS) database: A multidimensional scaling database of 1200 images across 20 categories.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual similarity is an essential concept in vision science, and the methods used to quantify similarity have recently expanded in the areas of human-derived ratings and computer vision methodologies. Researchers who want to manipulate similarity between images (e.g., in a visual search, categorization, or memory task) often use the aforementioned methods, which require substantial, additional data collection prior to the primary task of interest. To alleviate this problem, we have developed an openly available database that uses multidimensional scaling (MDS) to model the similarity among 1200 items spread across 20 object categories, thereby allowing researchers to utilize similarity ratings within and between categories. In this article, we document the development of this database, including (1) collecting similarity ratings using the spatial arrangement method across two sites, (2) our computational approach with MDS, and (3) validation of the MDS space by comparing SpAM-derived distances to direct similarity ratings. The database and similarity data provided between items (and across categories) will be useful to researchers wanting to manipulate or control similarity in their studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.