Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588608›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

The Pictures by Category and Similarity (PiCS) database: A multidimensional scaling database of 1200 images across 20 categories.

Arryn Robbins, Michael C Hout, Ashley Ercolino, Joseph Schmidt, Hayward J Godwin, Justin MacDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arryn RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, 114 UR Drive, Rm 113, Richmond, VA, 27303, USA. arobbins@richmond.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8629-1210
Michael C HoutDepartment of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.
Ashley ErcolinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Joseph SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Hayward J GodwinDepartment of Psychology, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
Justin MacDonaldDepartment of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual similarity is an essential concept in vision science, and the methods used to quantify similarity have recently expanded in the areas of human-derived ratings and computer vision methodologies. Researchers who want to manipulate similarity between images (e.g., in a visual search, categorization, or memory task) often use the aforementioned methods, which require substantial, additional data collection prior to the primary task of interest. To alleviate this problem, we have developed an openly available database that uses multidimensional scaling (MDS) to model the similarity among 1200 items spread across 20 object categories, thereby allowing researchers to utilize similarity ratings within and between categories. In this article, we document the development of this database, including (1) collecting similarity ratings using the spatial arrangement method across two sites, (2) our computational approach with MDS, and (3) validation of the MDS space by comparing SpAM-derived distances to direct similarity ratings. The database and similarity data provided between items (and across categories) will be useful to researchers wanting to manipulate or control similarity in their studies.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionHumansCategorizationImage databaseMultidimensional scalingVisual similarity

Identifiers

PMID40588608
PMCPMC12208956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.