Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588532›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025

Deep learning for automated, motion-resolved tumor segmentation in radiotherapy.

Sagnik Sarkar, P Troy Teo, Mohamed E Abazeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sagnik SarkarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
P Troy TeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mohamed E AbazeedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. mabazeed@northwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate tumor delineation is foundational to radiotherapy. In the era of deep learning, the automation of this labor-intensive and variation-prone process is increasingly tractable. We developed a deep neural network model to segment gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in the lung and propagate them across 4D CT images to generate an internal target volume (ITV), capturing tumor motion during respiration. Using a multicenter cohort-based registry from 9 clinics across 2 health systems, we trained a 3D UNet model (iSeg) on pre-treatment CT images and corresponding GTV masks (n = 739, 5-fold cross-validation) and validated it on two independent cohorts (n = 161; n = 102). The internal cohort achieved a median Dice (DSC) of 0.73 [IQR: 0.62-0.80], with comparable performance in external cohorts (DSC = 0.70 [0.52-0.78] and 0.71 [0.59-79]), indicating multi-site validation. iSeg matched human inter-observer variability and was robust to image quality and tumor motion (DSC = 0.77 [0.68-0.86]). Machine-generated ITVs were significantly smaller than physician delineated contours (p < 0.0001), indicating more precise delineation. Notably, higher false positive voxel rate (regions segmented by the machine but not the human) were associated with increased local failure (HR: 1.01 per voxel, p = 0.03), suggesting the clinical relevance of these discordant regions. These results mark a leap in automated target volume segmentation and suggest that machine delineation can enhance the accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency of this core task in radiotherapy.

Identifiers

PMID40588532
PMCPMC12209462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.