ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Outcomes of intraluminal ripcord removal from Paul glaucoma implants.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent aqueous misdirection following intraluminal ripcord removal from a Paul Glaucoma Implant.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of Tube Resistance in Glaucoma Drainage Devices with Intraluminal Polypropylene Threads.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exchange of Ahmed glaucoma valve for a Paul glaucoma implant and management of postoperative hypotony: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intraluminal ripcord suture removal (ROS) from the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI).
methodsA retrospective cohort study involving all PGI ripcord removal cases at a single centre between 1 January 2018 and 1 November 2023. The primary outcome was defined as a ≥20% reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP), or a decrease in IOP-lowering medications, at 3 months post-ROS.
results145 eyes of 131 patients were included. The mean interval between PGI implantation and ROS was 181.9±131.4 days. 70.3% of eyes met the primary endpoint of success, with second tubes and infero-nasal tube placement significantly associated with reduced success (p<0.05). Compared with the pre-ROS mean IOP (19.5±6.7 mm Hg), the post-ROS IOPs at 1 week, 1 and 3 months were significantly reduced to 12.7±7.4 mm Hg, 15.3±6.1 mm Hg and 13.7±5.3 mm Hg, respectively (p<0.0001). Similarly, the number of IOP-lowering medications was significantly reduced to 0.44±0.97, 0.75±1.18 and 1.12±1.30, respectively (p<0.005). Post-ROS complications included clinically significant hypotony (n=10, 6.9%), of which 6 eyes (4.1%) required surgical ripcord re-insertion, tube shunt occlusion (n=2, 1.4%) and post-ROS uveitis (n=1, 0.69%). We found no predictive factors for post-ROS hypotony, including the time of ROS since PGI surgery.
conclusionsROS from PGI resulted in at least 20% IOP or medication reduction in over 70% of eyes. Second and inferonasal tubes had reduced success. Clinical hypotony is the most common complication, without association with the time of stent removal since PGI implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.