ArticleBMJ global health2025
Towards equitable partnerships in global health research: experiences from Ethiopia, Uganda, Lao PDR and Vietnam.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-adapting a school-based mental health literacy intervention for adolescents in Cambodia and Vietnam.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Instituting solidarity: the role of research institutes in advancing global health equity.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- How effective are international deployments in strengthening low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to respond to outbreaks in the long term?BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Reciprocity in global health: How successes from the global south can inform global health interventions in Canada and the U.S.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equitable partnerships in global health research can counteract power imbalances in this field. Theoretical perspectives have been provided on equitable global health partnerships, but there are few reports from researchers actively engaged in such partnerships. This article departs from the experiences of four long-term global health research partnerships, two in Africa and two in Asia. It describes the challenges in enhancing an equitable research partnership and how these were addressed. The examples illustrate that funders can play a pivotal role in counteracting power imbalances by assigning leadership roles and directing primary funding to institutions where the research occurs. Such a transition requires adaptations and a new mindset on both sides. Embedded research capacity enhancement, part of all four partnership examples, is essential in correcting power imbalances. Capacity enhancement should preferably include enhancing the broader research ecosystem within the partner university, across academic institutions in the country or beyond. The development of mutual trust and respect takes time and requires long-term engagement, transparency in budgeting, project planning and all steps of the research process. Reciprocity in learning is important for all partners. It may include twinning of research students, joint degrees and efforts to bring research findings into policy and practice in all partner contexts. The partnership examples illustrate the achievements and challenges in bringing new research evidence into policy and practice, where early involvement and continuous buy-in by policymakers are crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.