ArticleBMJ global health2025
Primary health care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 South-East Asian countries: a cross-case synthesis with lessons for future health systems strengthening.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Primary Health Care into Flexible Surge Capacity: Bridging the Subnational "Missing Middle" in Health Emergency Preparedness.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The CI plus model: a qualitative study of innovative community isolation and enhanced resilience in urban Thailand during the COVID-19 crisis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionStrengthening primary health care (PHC) in the WHO South-East Asia Region is key to addressing evolving health needs, including the high burden of non-communicable diseases and emerging public health threats within rapidly changing demographic, climatic and geopolitical contexts. Between 2021 and 2023, 10 case studies were conducted to examine PHC in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-case regional synthesis aimed to identify key lessons for PHC strengthening from the pandemic experience.
methodsThe synthesis involved comparative analysis using an analytic framework comprising three PHC components framed by the Astana PHC vision: integrated primary care and essential public health functions; multisectoral policy and action; and community empowerment. The case studies used document review and consultations with national PHC experts and policymakers.
results
conclusionFindings demonstrate how PHC principles remain relevant not only for responding to public health emergencies, but also for improving and promoting health system resilience. Findings highlight opportunities to further examine and implement health workforce, community engagement, digital technology and governance strategies to meet evolving epidemiological and climate-related health challenges facing the Region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.