Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588250›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

Staging growing rod insertion results in increased postoperative complications than the equivalent unstaged procedure.

Lily S Switzer, Emma B Nadler, Jennifer A Dermott, Karim Aboelmagd, Alison Anthony, Dorothy J Kim, Mark Camp, David E Lebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lily S SwitzerThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Emma B NadlerThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer A DermottThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Karim AboelmagdThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Alison AnthonyThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Dorothy J KimThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Mark CampThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
David E LebelThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Anchor-related complications are the leading cause for unplanned surgery in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). One strategy to reduce unplanned surgery is staging implant insertion. This study compares the outcomes of staged versus unstaged growing rod (GR) insertion, focusing on complication rates. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined 48 EOS patients who received GR surgery at a single institution (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada) between January 2006 and July 2023. Patients were grouped according to staged and unstaged GR insertion. Radiological measurements were obtained preoperatively, post-insertion, and one-year follow-up to determine radiological change between and within each group. Complications were recorded until posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent follow-up if no PSF was performed, and compared between groups. Results: Overall, 24 patients received staged and 24 patients received unstaged dual GR insertion. The mean follow-up time for patients was 53.1 months (SD 33.1). Patients who underwent unstaged insertion had greater Cobb angle correction (46.6% (SD 15.9%) vs 31.5% (SD 13.3%), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in kyphosis correction (p = 0.118) or thoracic height growth (p = 0.348) between groups. Staged patients experienced a higher complication rate compared to unstaged patients within the first year following insertion (38% vs 12%). Differences in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development between staged (17%) and unstaged (29%) patients were not significant (p = 0.303). The mean insertion-associated length of stay was longer in staged patients (10.7 days (SD 4.2)) compared to unstaged patients (5.8 days (SD 4.0), p < 0.001). Conclusion: Staged and unstaged GR insertion results in acceptable coronal correction and comparable radiological parameters. However, staged insertion may not be superior to unstaged insertion given the increased length of stay and rate of complications associated with the procedure.

Identifiers

PMID40588250
PMCPMC12208744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.