Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588165›Full record

ArticleDialogues in clinical neuroscience2025

Deep learning with ensemble-based hybrid AI model for bipolar and unipolar depression detection using demographic and behavioral based on time-series data.

Naga Raju Kanchapogu, Sachi Nandan Mohanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naga Raju KanchapoguSchool of Computer Science & Engineering (SCOPE), VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0009-0001-8322-635X
Sachi Nandan MohantySchool of Computer Science & Engineering (SCOPE), VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-0797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression, including Bipolar and Unipolar types, is a widespread mental health issue. Conventional diagnostic methods rely on subjective assessments, leading to possible underreporting and bias. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) offer automated approaches to detect depression using behavioral and demographic data.

methodsThis study proposes a hybrid AI framework combining structured demographic features with synthetic actigraph time-series data. Demographic data is modeled using an XGBoost ensemble, while temporal data is analyzed through a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). The training pipeline includes stratified k-fold cross-validation, hyperparameter tuning, and statistical testing. Model explainability is enhanced using SHAP (XGBoost) and Grad-CAM (CNN).

resultsThe hybrid model demonstrated strong classification performance across metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Integrating temporal and static features improved prediction of Bipolar and Unipolar Depression. Interpretability tools revealed key features and time patterns influencing predictions.

conclusionsThis work introduces a robust and interpretable framework for depression classification using synthetic multimodal data. While not clinically validated, the model serves as a methodological foundation for future research with real-world datasets.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderDeep LearningDepressive DisorderAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, Computeractigraph time-series analysisbipolar disorderDepression predictionhybrid deep learning modelmachine learningunipolar depression

Identifiers

PMID40588165
PMCPMC12210415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.