Observational studyJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Receiving Systemic Treatment Using Step Count Data Measured With Smartphones.
Observational study in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital solutions, real-world challenges: lessons from mHealth trials in oncology.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Trial
- Designing for Autonomous Motivation: Qualitative Interview Study on Pre-Enrollment Preferences of Survivors of Cancer for Digital Health Behavior Change Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate whether changes in step count, measured using patients' own smartphones, could predict a clinical adverse event in the upcoming week in patients undergoing systemic anticancer treatments using machine learning models.
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study included patients with various cancer types receiving systemic anticancer treatment. Physical activity was monitored continuously using patients' own smartphones, measuring daily step count for 90 days during treatment. Clinical adverse events (ie, unplanned hospitalizations and treatment modifications) were extracted from medical records. Models predicting adverse events in the upcoming 7 days were created using physical activity data from the preceding 2 weeks. Machine learning models (elastic net [EN], random forest [RF], and neural network [NN]) were trained and validated on a 70:30 split cohort. Model performance was evaluated using the AUC.
resultsAmong the 76 patients analyzed (median age 61 [IQR, 53-69] years, 39 [51%] female), 11 (14%) were hospitalized during the study period. The median step count during the first week of systemic treatment was 4,303 [IQR, 1926-7,056]. Unplanned hospitalizations in the upcoming 7 days could be predicted with high accuracy using RF (AUC = 0.88), NN (AUC = 0.84), and EN (AUC = 0.83). The models could not predict treatment modifications (AUC = 0.28-0.51) or the occurrence of any clinically relevant adverse event (AUC = 0.32-0.50).
conclusionA decline in daily step counts can serve as an early predictor for hospitalizations in the upcoming 7 days, facilitating proactive and preventive toxicity management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.