Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587786›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Transformative community-engaged science: Strengthening relationships between science and society.

Rajul E Pandya, Amanda D Boyd, Mónica I Feliú-Mójer, Itzhak Yanovitzky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Engaging patient communities in intracranial neuroscience research.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Editorial: Clarity of Mind.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. An agenda for science communication research and practice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajul E PandyaMary Lou Fulton College for Teaching and Learning Innovation and Julie Ann Wrigley Global Futures Laboratory, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-5239
Amanda D BoydDepartment of Medical and Clinical Sciences, The Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.ORCID 0000-0002-6055-2128
Mónica I Feliú-MójerCiencia Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 00919.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-1959
Itzhak YanovitzkySchool of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.ORCID 0000-0001-6366-8006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a critical need to strengthen science-society relationships-especially with historically marginalized communities-if we are to better and more equitably manage complicated, intertwined, global challenges at the intersection of environment, health, equity, and well-being. Community-engaged science, which focuses on shared leadership and mutual benefit in scientific partnership with communities, has the potential to transform science, communities, and even society. Despite this promise, however, community-engaged science is not always transformative. Presentations and discussions at the 5th National Academies Science Communication Colloquium demonstrated the importance of creating structures, practices, and a culture of science engagement that prioritizes listening and learning from communities. Based on presentations at the colloquium, research publications, and our own experiences, we share a set of evidence-informed principles that are common to successful community-engaged science across many contexts: respect, humility, listening, reciprocity, mutuality, and reflexivity. We also offer steps the scientific community can take to advance and improve the transformative practice of community-engaged science as part of a productive ecosystem of scientific activities: evolving norms and culture, integrating community science into current systems, building incentives and structures to support community-engaged science, developing a workforce skilled in community engagement, and investing in a coordinated research-to-practice agenda.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationScienceCultureHumansRespectSocial Marginalizationcommunity engagementcoproductionparticipatory researchpublic impact researchscience–society relationships

Identifiers

PMID40587786
PMCPMC12260419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.