Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587558›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Effects of experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic on optimistically biased belief updating.

Iraj Khalid, Orphee Morlaas, Hugo Bottemanne, Lisa Thonon, Thomas Da Costa, Philippe Fossati, Liane Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iraj KhalidControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-5055
Orphee MorlaasControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Hugo BottemanneControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-0849
Lisa ThononControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Thomas Da CostaControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6983-6259
Philippe FossatiControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Liane SchmidtControl-interception-attention team, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), UMR 7225, U1127, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Sorbonne Universités, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-9705

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE37-0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimistically biased belief updating is essential for mental health and resilience in adversity. Here, we asked how experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic affected optimism biases in updating beliefs about the future. One hundred and twenty-three participants estimated the risk of experiencing adverse future life events in the face of belief-disconfirming evidence either outside the pandemic (n=58) or during the pandemic (n=65). While belief updating was optimistically biased and Reinforcement-learning-like outside the pandemic, the bias faded, and belief updating became more rational Bayesian-like during the pandemic. This malleability of anticipating the future during the COVID-19 pandemic was further underpinned by a lower integration of positive belief-disconfirming information, fewer but stronger negative estimations, and more confidence in base rates. The findings offer a window into the putative cognitive mechanisms of belief updating during the COVID-19 pandemic, driven more by quantifying the uncertainty of the future than by the motivational salience of optimistic outlooks.

Indexed as

COVID-19OptimismAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2UncertaintyYoung AdultBayesian modelingbelief-updatingcomputational modelingCovid-19humanneuroscienceoptimism biasreinforcement-learning

Identifiers

PMID40587558
PMCPMC12208662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.