Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587520›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Investigate channel rectifications and neural dynamics by an electrodiffusive Gauss-Nernst-Planck approach.

Zichao Liu, Yinyun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zichao LiuSchool of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yinyun LiComputational Neuroscience Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8286-160X

Funding

Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityScience and Technology Innovation 2030 major projects
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrodiffusion plays a crucial role in modulating ion channel conductivity and neural firing dynamics within the nervous system. However, the relationship among ion electrodiffusion, concentration changes, as well as channel conductivity and neuronal discharge behaviors is not quite clear. In this work, we introduce a novel Gauss-Nernst-Planck (GNP) approach to investigate how electrodiffusive dynamics influence ion channel rectification and neural activity. We have analytically demonstrated how the membrane conductance changes along with voltage and ion concentrations due to the electrodiffusive dynamics, bridging the gap between the permeability-based Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) model and conductance-based models. We characterize the rectification properties of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and leaky channels by estimating their single-channel permeabilities and conductance. By integrating these rectifying channels into neurodynamic models, our GNP neurodynamic model reveals how electrodiffusive dynamics fundamentally shape neural firing by modulating membrane conductance and the interplay between passive and active ion transport-mechanisms, which exhibits difference from conventional conductance-based neurodynamic models especially when ion concentration accumulates to high levels. Furthermore, we have explored how the electrodiffusive dynamics influence the pathological neural events by modulating the stability of neurodynamic system. This study provides a fundamental mechanistic understanding of electrodiffusion regulation in neural activity and establishes a robust framework for future research in neurophysiology.

Indexed as

Ion ChannelsModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID40587520
PMCPMC12208492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.