ArticlePloS one2025
Intense low-frequency sound transiently biases human sound lateralisation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intense low-frequency (LF) sound exposure transiently alters hearing thresholds and other markers of cochlear sensitivity, and for these changes the term 'Bounce phenomenon' (BP) has been coined. Under the BP, hearing thresholds slowly oscillate for several minutes involving both stages of hyper- and hyposensitivity and it is reasonable to assume that the perception of sounds at levels well above threshold will also be affected. Here, we evaluated the effect of the BP on auditory lateralisation in healthy human subjects. Sound lateralisation crucially depends on the processing of either interaural level- or time differences (ILDs and ITDs, respectively), depending on the spectral content of the sound. The ILD needed to perceive a virtual sound source in the middle of the head was tracked across time. Measurements were carried out without and with a previous exposure to an intense LF-sound in the left ear, to elicit the BP. In 65% of the recordings, significant time-variant deviations from the perceived midline were observed after cessation of the LF-sound. In other words, a binaural stimulus perceived in the middle moved perceptually to the side and often back to the middle after presentation of the intense LF-sound. This means that intense LF-sound exposure can lead to a biasing of ILD-based sound localisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.