SynthesisPloS one2025
Comparative meta-analysis of barely transcriptome: Pathogen type determines host preference.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungi and aphids show mutual interactions on barley pathogenesis. Fungi promote pathogenesis, while aphids either weaken or strengthen the infection. Otherwise, fungi alter aphid behavior and performance, further highlighting their complex interactions. Characterizing these synergistic and antagonistic interactions is crucial for understanding pathogenesis. Therefore, we performed meta-analysis and co-expression gene network analyses of the barley transcriptome in response to fungus and aphid based on hormone signaling pathways. We selected 13 studies, including 380 fungal infection samples, 48 aphid-attack samples, and 34 hormone-treated samples. We showed that 1.1% of DEGs were common between fungal and aphid-related datasets, while only 0.1% of DEGs were shared among all datasets. In addition, 70% of common DEGs were uniquely regulated by JA or SA signaling. In contrast, 30% of DEGs were regulated by both JA and SA simultaneously. Regulatory element analysis revealed that 85% of DEGs contained at least one binding site from AP2/EREBP or C2H2 zinc-finger factors that show substantial roles in SAR/ISR pathways during plant defense. Gene network analysis identified key hub genes, including SSI2, PAD2, RPS1, RPS17, SHM1, CYP5, and RPL21C, which influence plant host preference in response to pathogens. Moreover, we identified novel hub genes with unknown functions that potentially interact with the genes involved in defense responses and host preference. This study presents the first systems biology analysis of barley transcriptomic responses to heterotroph/biotroph cross-talk focusing on the preference and performance of Rhopalosiphum padi. Our findings suggest critical insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying barley defense responses and identify valuable candidate genes to developing pathogen resistance genotypes in agricultural systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.