ArticlePloS one2025
Selective activation of ipRGC modulates working memory performance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photostimulation improves maturation of human photoreceptors.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Relationships between light exposure and aspects of cognitive function in everyday life.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells and visual processing: ipRGCs beyond non-image-forming functions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Research progress on the neural mechanism of light therapy improving cognitive function in depression: from retinal projections to neuroplasticity.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are known to be sensitive to short-wavelength light (460-480 nm; blue or cyan light) and to play a role in regulating physiological responses such as circadian rhythms. Previous studies have shown that exposure to blue light improves performance on working memory tasks compared with exposure to amber light. However, it remains unclear whether these cognitive benefits via light are attributable to integrated signals across ipRGCs and rod/cone or ipRGC alone. To address this, the present study investigates the specific contribution of ipRGCs to working memory performance using a silent substitution method that selectively manipulates ipRGC activity while minimizing the influence of LMS cone responses. Participants engaged in 1- and 2-back tasks under low- or high-ipRGC activation light, a metameric color perceived as magenta. Results showed that hit rate in the 2-back task was significantly higher under exposure to high-ipRGC light than to low-ipRGC light. Our overall findings provide direct evidence that isolated ipRGC activation, independent of perceptual blue or cone involvement, can modulate cognitive task processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.