Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587487›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Detecting Interspecific Positive Selection Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Charlotte West, Conor R Walker, Shayesteh Arasti, Viacheslav Vasilev, Xingze Xu, Nicola De Maio, Nick Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte WestEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2094-3324
Conor R WalkerEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5617-5086
Shayesteh ArastiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-1607-5300
Viacheslav VasilevEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-9368-7524
Xingze XuEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-6241-8533
Nicola De MaioEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-8564
Nick GoldmanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-2211

Funding

European Molecular Biology LaboratoryNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre IS-BRC-1215-20014NIH HHS IS-BRC-1215-20014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional statistical methods using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference can detect positive selection from an interspecific phylogeny and a codon sequence alignment based on model assumptions, but they are prone to false positives due to alignment errors and can lack power. These problems are particularly pronounced when faced with high levels of indels and divergence. To address these issues, we trained and tested convolutional neural network models on simulated data and achieved higher accuracy in detecting selection across a specific range of phylogenetic scenarios and evolutionary modes. This advantage is particularly evident when performing inference on noisy data prone to misalignments. Our method shows some ability to account for these errors, where most statistical frameworks fail to do so in a tractable manner. We explore the generalizability of our convolutional neural network models to unseen evolutionary scenarios and identify future avenues to achieve broader utility. Once trained, our convolutional neural network model is faster at test time, making it a scalable alternative to traditional statistical methods for large-scale, multigene analyses. In addition to binary classification (inference of the presence or absence of positive selection during the evolution of the sequences), we use saliency maps to understand what the model learns and observe how this could be leveraged for sitewise inference of positive selection.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSelection, GeneticConvolutional Neural NetworksEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticPhylogenyAIconvolutional neural networkevolutionmachine learningpositive selectionselection

Identifiers

PMID40587487
PMCPMC12287699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.