ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Enhanced E-commerce decision-making through sentiment analysis using machine learning-based approaches and IoT.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retraction: Enhanced E-commerce decision-making through sentiment analysis using machine learning-based approaches and IoT.PloS one · 2026Article
- Enhancing products performance evaluation through hybrid DistilRoBERTa and BiGRU models.PloS one · 2026Article
- Textual emotion recognition to improve real-time communication of disabled people in sustainable environments using an ensemble deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-02-05Compromised Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
E-commerce is a vital component of the world economy, providing people with a simple and convenient method for shopping and enabling businesses to expand into new global markets. Improving e-commerce decision-making by utilizing IoT and machine intelligence represents an important area for the impact of these technologies. Our objective is to elevate online shopping to a new level, making it a practical and genuinely delightful experience for customers. Businesses can acquire valuable insights to improve their operations and sales strategies by employing IoT devices to collect customer behavior and preference data and using machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze them. In addition, companies can make simple recommendations using machine learning on the collected data. Our creative implementation of ML algorithms extends beyond simple recommendations. It also includes demand forecasting, guaranteeing that popular products are constantly in stock, reducing disappointments, and increasing consumer satisfaction. We applied several ML techniques, including logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), AdaBoosting, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). AdaBoosting outperformed the deep learning (DL) techniques LSTM and GRU and four ML techniques, logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, SVM, and RF, regarding F1 scores, accuracy, precision, and recall. It achieved an accuracy of 88%, an F1-score of 0.927, precision-1 of 0.908, and the ability of identifying true negatives and true positives (recall-0 and recall-1) of 0.569 and 0.947 respectively. Except for SVM, the other ML techniques did not exhibit much performance difference when using the count vectorizer and TD-IDF vectorizer. This study advances e-commerce capabilities through IoT and machine learning and paves the way for a new era of customer-centric, efficient, and adaptive retail strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.