ArticlePloS one2025
Declining harbour seal abundance in a previously recovering meta-population.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrient availability drives local seasonal movements of an endangered marine megafauna species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Haul-Out Site Use and Connectivity of Harbour Seals Between Management Units in Southern Scandinavia.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Clinical Chemistry Reference Intervals for Health Assessment in Wild Adult Harbour Seals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present evidence that the abundance of harbour seals in the Kattegat-Skagerrak is in decline. Until recently, the Kattegat-Skagerrak harbour seal population has grown exponentially as it has recovered from historic over-hunting and two mass mortality events. This has provided an important case study for the influence of environmental factors on population growth. Over recent years, deteriorating average body condition and reduced pup counts in certain colonies have indicated that the population is under stress. At the same time, there has been an increase in hunting in the region which may compound existing environmental stressors. To determine trends in harbour seal abundance, we compile aerial survey data for the Kattegat-Skagerrak and South-Western Baltic Sea (S.W. Baltic) populations between the years 2003 and 2023. With parametric modelling, we find that a logistic growth model is the best fit for aerial survey data from the Kattegat-Skagerrak population, while an exponential growth model is the best fit for data from the smaller S.W. Baltic population. We determine trends by fitting non-parametric Generalised Additive Models (GAMs) to aerial survey data and calculating their first derivative. In the Kattegat-Skagerrak, we estimate an annual decline of - 408 individuals (SE = 242, CI95% = [- 882, 67]) at the end of the survey period. This decline represents approximately 3.3% of the estimated mean count in 2023. Rate of change remained positive in the separate S.W. Baltic population throughout the survey period at an estimated annual increase of 54 individuals (SE = 23, CI95% = [9,99]), representing approximately 3.9% of mean counts in 2023. We find that the final rate of change was zero or below zero in eleven out of twelve subregions (representing individual colonies) in the Kattegat-Skagerrak. Declining counts in the Kattegat-Skagerrak since the mid-2010s may be influenced by changes in haul-out behaviour as a result of increased population density or vessel traffic. Despite this, declines likely reflect real changes in seal abundance. Changes in abundance may be the result of well documented environmental degradation affecting prey availability and causing regionally lowered birth rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.