ArticlePloS one2025
Interpretable machine learning for predicting isolated basal septal hypertrophy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peak strain dispersion as a nonlinear mediator in HFpEF: Unraveling subtype-specific pathways via SHAP-augmented ensemble modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe basal septal hypertrophy(BSH) is an often under-recognized morphological change in the left ventricle. This is a common echocardiographic finding with a prevalence of approximately 7-20%, which may indicate early structural and functional remodeling of the left ventricle in certain pathologies. It also poses a risk of severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and is a significant cause of postoperative complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Compared to traditional algorithms, machine learning algorithms are more effective at capturing nonlinear relationships and developing more accurate diagnostic and predictive models. However, no predictive models for BSH have been developed using machine learning algorithms.
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of five machine learning algorithms in predicting thickening of the basal segment of the interventricular septum and to develop a simple, yet efficient, prediction model for BSH.
methodsEchocardiographic and clinical data from 902 patients were collected from the First Central Hospital of Baoding City, including 91 BSH patients and 811 non-BSH patients. The data were divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Five machine learning algorithms -XGBoost, Random Forest(RF), Dicision tree(DT), K-Nearest Neighbor classification(KNN), and Naive Bayes(NB) were applied to construct the models, combined with logistic regression (LR) based on Lasso regression. The performance of each model was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC),calibration curves and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA)curve, with the model demonstrating the best performance being selected. The shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method was employed to interpret the XBoost and RF models.
resultsThe logistic regression (LR) of the Lasso regression model showed that IVS-AO Angle, Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI), Diastolic Left Ventricular Internal Diameter Index (LVIDdI), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Distance from mitral valve closure point to basal segment of interventricular septum (MVCP-Sd), GLU, and Mitral Valve peak A (MV-A) were associated with BSH, with odds ratios (OR) of 0.86 (0.831-0.888), 1.034 (1.018-1.052), 0.104 (0.023-0.403), 1.041 (1.021-1.064), 0.964 (0.93-0.998), 0.852 (0.764-0.949), 1.146 (1.023-1.281), and 0.967 (0.947-0.987), respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for Model-relevant variable IVS-AO Angle, MVCP_Sd,LVMI, GLU, LVIDdI, SBP,DBP,LVIDdI,MV_A were 0.87,0.68,0.66,0.55,0.56,0.67,0.75,0.75. The AUC for the algorithms (XGBoost, RF, DT, KNN, NB) in the test set were 0.92, 0.91, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively. The SHAP method identified eight predictor variables for BSH based on importance rankings, with the top four being IVS-AO Angle, LVMI, LVIDdI, and SBP, with IVS-AO Angle emerging as the most important predictor. The external validation of the RF model yielded an AUC of 0.86.
conclusionMachine learning can effectively predict BSH, with IVS-AO Angle identified as an independent predictor. The RF model, being simple to operate, can be applied to the risk management of BSH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.