ArticlePloS one2025
Decoding the "Pain-to-Door" interval using psychological, medical, and demographic factors: A multi-center study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReducing the amount of time between the onset of symptoms and presentation to a healthcare facility, namely the "pain-to-door" interval, is of utmost importance in patients with myocardial infarction. In the present study, we aimed to shed light on the psychological, medical, and demographic factors that are associated with this vital time, and the details of this association.
methodsWe used the baseline data of 1685 participants from a 3-year, multi-centric, cohort study. The pain to door time was estimated as the interval between symptoms' onset and arrival at the hospital. Patients were asked to fill out valid and reliable questionnaires regarding sociodemographic factors, depression, health anxiety, type D personality, sense of coherence, coping strategies, and quality of life. Data was then analyzed to attain the p-value and hazard ratios (HR) of different variables.
resultsIn the multivariate analysis, being male (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.98) and a history of angina (0.82, 0.69-0.96) were associated with shorter pain-to-door durations. A history of diabetes mellitus also made the cut marginally (p-value: 0.059). On the contrary, health anxiety (1.27, 1.09-1.49), history of depression (1.57, 1.21-2.05), high socioeconomic status (1.25, 1.03-1.51) and sense of coherence (1.34, 1.14-1.57) scores were associated with longer pain-to-door durations.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that personal, social, and economical characteristics play a pivotal role in determining patients' pain-to-door time duration. Screening high-risk individuals in terms of the factors that tend to increase the pain-to-door time alongside educating people and healthcare providers on the importance of this interval and its contributing factors must be a priority considering the devastating burden of CVDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.