Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587388›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2026

Enhancing Electronic Availability of Hospital Records Following Interhospital Transfer From Emergency Departments to a Veterans Affairs Hospital.

James O Jordano, Maureen Fausone, Michael R Cauley, Melissa Rubenstein, Terra Swanson, Kelly Sopko, Michael J Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James O JordanoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1601-1022
Maureen FausoneDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, United States.
Michael R CauleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Melissa RubensteinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Terra SwansonDivision of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Kelly SopkoSection of Hospital Medicine, Veteran's Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN 37212, United States.
Michael J WardDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.

Funding

Vanderbilt Interdisciplinary Hospital-Based Systems of Care Research and Training ProgrAm (VISTA)T32HL170986 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUNIL KRIPALANI, ALAN B STORROW · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026122Health Services Research and Development I21HX003709HSRD VA I21 HX003709National Center for Patient Safety Chief Resident in Quality and Patient Safety ProgramNHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL170986Office of Research and DevelopmentVAVeterans Health Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith regionalization of specialized care and consolidation of rural hospitals, safe and efficient care transitions via interhospital transfers, particularly for patients in the emergency department (ED), are of paramount importance to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Transferred patients are at higher risk for mortality, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. Complete documentation is central to high quality care transitions yet is infrequently completed. Incomplete documentation may harm patients by fragmenting care. Since the passage of federal legislation, non-Veteran Affairs (VA) emergency care has skyrocketed. However, the lack of a standardized process for medical record sharing following non-VA ED visits and subsequent interhospital transfer risks care interruption and therefore patient safety. We sought to evaluate the existing process and how standardization may affect the timeliness and availability of Veteran hospital records from non-VA hospitals. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a quality improvement project conducted at a single, urban, community, level 1 complexity VA-the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville Campus (TVHS-Na). Before this project, paper medical records related to non-VA emergency care were given to the primary team by the transferring ambulance service. Paper records were then uploaded to the document imaging system at each team's discretion, typically after hospital discharge. To understand the problem and flow of records, we conducted a contextual inquiry. From there, we developed and implemented a standardized process to receive and upload electronic health records before the patient arrived at the hospital for all daytime weekday transfers. After-hours transfers maintained existing processes. The project had a Plan-Do-Study-Act design, informed by the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Roadmap.The project was approved as a quality improvement project by the local institutional review board. Interhospital transfers were tracked from January 2024 to September 2024. All transfers from a non-VA ED to TVHS-Na as a direct hospital floor admission were included. The primary outcomes were time until availability of scanned records and percent of transfers with uploaded records as identified in the document imaging system.

resultsThrough a contextual inquiry with stakeholders, we identified that intervention at the time of transfer acceptance was possible with the help of transfer coordinators. As part of the novel intervention, coordinators would ask transferring hospitals for electronic transmission of certain optional documents. This would occur before the physical transfer of the patient. Over the project's course, there were 157 interhospital transfers from non-VA EDs that met eligibility. Before implementation, the median (interquartile range, IQR) time to document availability was 33 (24, 36) days. The proportion of transfers with uploaded records at this time was 40% (13/32). Ten transfers occurred during the "washout phase" during which the intervention was implemented. After implementation, the median (IQR) time until upload improved to 0 (0, 0) days. The proportion of transfers with uploaded records also improved to 51% (59/115).

conclusionsImplementing a simple, standardized process increased the number of transfers with available records and reduced the time until the electronic availability of those records. However, after-hours transfers remain a target for future intervention.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient TransferDocumentationEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, VeteransHumansQuality ImprovementTennesseeUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID40587388
PMCPMC12533482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.