Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587363›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Routemap for health impact assessment implementation: scoping review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

Tara Kenny, Ben Harris-Roxas, Sheena McHugh, Margaret Douglas, Liz Green, Fiona Haigh, Joanna Purdy, Paul Kavanagh, Monica O'Mullane

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara KennySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, 4th Floor, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork T12 XF62, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8483-9262
Ben Harris-RoxasSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney  2052, Australia.
Sheena McHughSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, 4th Floor, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork T12 XF62, Ireland.
Margaret DouglasPublic Health Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-5451
Liz GreenInternational Health, WHO Collaborating Centre on 'Investment in Health and Well-Being', Public Health Wales, Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF104BZ, United Kingdom.
Fiona HaighInternational Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney 2052, Australia.
Joanna PurdyInstitute of Public Health, 700 South Circular Road, Dublin 8 D08 NH90, Ireland.
Paul KavanaghNational Health Intelligence Unit, 4th Floor Jervis House, Jervis Street, Dublin DO1 E3W9, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-2247
Monica O'MullaneSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, 4th Floor, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork T12 XF62, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board, Ireland EIA-2022-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) provides a practical set of tools to appraise the potential health effects of a policy, programme, or project prior to implementation. HIA has gained significant attention in recent decades due to its utility in facilitating a broader understanding of health and bringing diverse stakeholders and evidence into decision-making processes. Despite this interest in HIA its implementation remains challenging within governance, decision making, and regulatory contexts. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 provides a methodological framework to identify potential factors influencing implementation and the domains in which they operate, within the framework. For the purpose of this scoping review, implementation refers to the process of carrying out an HIA, and where applicable, the implementation of its recommendations. This review presents a novel exploration of HIA from an implementation science perspective. It provides a synthesis of the factors influencing HIA implementation and identifies a range of considerations and strategies that may facilitate and strengthen HIA implementation and support. The findings suggest that the earlier steps are critical in assisting the practical application and implementation of HIA. However, building wider HIA support, awareness, and capacity essential to progressing HIA is dependent on wider public health advocacy and addressing challenges specific to HIA as a method and tool. CFIR offers a useful and adaptable framework that could be used for supporting HIA planning, practice, and implementation.

Indexed as

Health Impact AssessmentHealth PromotionImplementation ScienceDecision MakingHealth PolicyHumansPublic Healthconsolidated framework for implementation science research (CFIR)health impact assessment (HIA)health in all policiesimplementation sciencescoping review

Identifiers

PMID40587363
PMCPMC12208066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.