ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2025
An Integrated Approach to Concurrently Measure Corrective and Adaptive Responses to Auditory Errors.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working Memory Modulates Auditory Perceptual Sensitivity During Speech Planning.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Individuals with aphasia generate larger adaptive and corrective responses to suddenly introduced auditory perturbations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- The complex impact of auditory error direction, magnitude, and exposure on corrective responses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Delayed auditory feedback increases speech production variability in typically fluent adults but has the opposite effect in stuttering adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe brain relies on feedforward and feedback control systems to produce speech movements. Both control systems use auditory errors to generate responses that ensure the accuracy of speech movements. Traditionally, separate auditory perturbation paradigms are used to examine these control systems in isolation; however, this conventional practice is time-consuming and poses practical challenges. This study aimed to develop a new paradigm to examine both control systems concurrently.
methodWe applied different auditory perturbation magnitudes (0, 125, 250, and 500 Hz) and directions (ε-to-ɪ and ε-to-ӕ) that randomly changed every six trials. We measured formant changes during early (0-100 ms) and late (200-300 ms) time points of production. Early response was used to calculate adaptive responses (a measure of the feedforward control system). The difference between late and early responses was used to calculate corrective responses (a measure of the feedback control system).
resultsWe found that participants produced (a) adaptive and corrective responses in the opposite direction of the perturbation direction and (b) proportionally larger adaptive and corrective responses to the smallest perturbation in the ε-to-ɪ direction. Additionally, participants who responded more to ε-to-ɪ perturbations also responded more to ε-to-ӕ perturbations.
conclusionThese findings suggest that (a) the brain may have similar error sensitivity in the ε-to-ɪ and ε-to-ӕ directions and considers error magnitudes in preparing its responses to errors, and (b) our proposed paradigm is a promising approach to efficiently and concurrently measure the contributions of the feedback and feedforward controls systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.