Trial reportLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2025
Generative Language Intervention for Young Children With Down Syndrome Using Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmentative and Alternative Communication Generative Language Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Trial
- Introduction to the Forum: Changemakers Igniting Innovation.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChildren with Down syndrome often have poor speech intelligibility, which can mask expressive language competence; this, in turn, can lead to serious misconceptions about overall competence and intellectual abilities. Although aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) can be used to bridge these gaps, children with Down syndrome are not always provided with consistent access to focused AAC language intervention supports. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing the AAC Generative Language Intervention (AAC-GLI) approach on the aided expressive grammar productions of young children with Down syndrome.
methodA randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the results. The study included a control group and an intervention group, with the families of both groups participating in half-day AAC implementation workshops and all children receiving AAC devices to use throughout the course of the study. The intervention group also received 4 months of twice-weekly play-based AAC-GLI intervention sessions. Progress was measured using a mean length of utterance (MLU) specially designed for aided communicators (weighted MLU in symbols [W-MLUSym]).
resultsStrong effects indicated superior performance on W-MLUSym for the intervention group, despite reduced enrollment and increased attrition yielded by the COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionsAAC-GLI can be used to teach young children with Down syndrome to improve their aided expressive grammar skills. Providing AAC language intervention for young children with Down syndrome can be a critical step to support ongoing expressive language development and use as well as overall functional communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.