ArticleJournal of global health2025
Hobby engagement and all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk among people aged 50 years and older in 19 countries.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mediating effects of depressive symptoms on the association between hobby engagement and functional disability: evidence from three cohort studies.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Hobby engagement and hypertension risk: evidence from two large prospective cohorts.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Hobby engagement, disability transitions, and life expectancy: a multinational longitudinal study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global population ageing necessitates identifying modifiable factors for healthy longevity. Hobby engagement emerges as a promising yet unexplored factor; evidence of its protective effects on all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk has never been examined at a multinational level. Methods: We investigated hobby engagement and mortality risk among 79 464 adults aged ≥50 across 19 countries using harmonised longitudinal ageing cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models examined associations between hobby engagement and all-cause mortality. Competing risk models assessed cause-specific mortality. Marginal structural models evaluated the impact of change patterns in hobby engagement over time. Results: Hobby engagement was associated with a 29% reduction in all-cause mortality risk across 19 countries (pooled hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.67, 0.75). Population attributable fractions ranged from 3.03% (in Denmark) to 23.56% (in China), with potential gains in life expectancy from 0.06 years (in China) to 1.02 years (in Sweden) over five years. Region-specific protective effects emerged: reduced mortality from endocrine/metabolic (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 0.31) and neurological conditions (SHR = 0.51) in the USA; cardiovascular mortality (SHR = 0.56) in England; and heart attack (SHR = 0.77), stroke (SHR = 0.62), other cardiovascular-related illnesses (SHR = 0.82), and respiratory disease (SHR = 0.68) in Europe. Hobby engagement patterns varied dramatically across countries, from predominant non-engagement in China (65.1%) to high sustained engagement in Northern Europe (>90%). Both initiating (pooled HR = 0.62) and sustaining (pooled HR = 0.45) hobby engagement were associated with a reduction in mortality risk compared to sustained non-engagement, while cessation eliminated these protective associations (pooled HR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.88, 1.04). Benefits were more pronounced among adults aged ≥65 and married individuals. Conclusions: Hobby engagement is a potentially universal, modifiable factor for promoting global healthy longevity. Public health strategies prioritising initiating and maintaining hobby engagement could yield substantial survival benefits, particularly in countries with predominant non-engagement patterns and high preventable mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.