Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587104›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

Having more friends is associated with greater sensitization to social exclusion: neural and behavioral evidence.

Elisa C Baek, Yixuan Lisa Shen, Hairin Kim, Ekaterina Baldina, Jeanyung Chey, Yoosik Youm, Carolyn Parkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa C BaekDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2834-1766
Yixuan Lisa ShenDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-4067-4566
Hairin KimDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-608X
Ekaterina BaldinaDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8173-4978
Jeanyung CheyDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5371-7783
Yoosik YoumDepartment of Sociology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03772, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-5777
Carolyn ParkinsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-3480

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021S1A5A2A03065033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social rejection profoundly affects well-being. How do features of people's real-world social networks relate to responses to social exclusion? People central in social networks-e.g. who have many friends-may be less distressed by exclusion, since they have many sources of support, or more sensitive to it, if they are more attuned to social feedback. We characterized a village's social network; a subset of residents (N = 74) completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study involving social exclusion in groups characterized by varying social relationships (spouses, friends, strangers). Highly-central individuals reported greater distress during exclusion by strangers, and their distress ratings scaled with responses in brain regions associated with social pain, negative affect, and mentalizing. Thus, while social connectedness is often considered a protective factor that promotes well-being, these findings suggest a potential ironic effect of social connectedness-vulnerability to distress in particular social contexts. This sensitization to exclusion could constitute an adaptive tendency to promote long-term wellness.

Indexed as

BrainFriendsInterpersonal RelationsPsychological DistanceSocial IsolationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultfMRIlonelinesssocial network analysissocial rejection

Identifiers

PMID40587104
PMCPMC12342143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.