Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587090›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2025

Immunalysis tapentadol assay reformulation resolves tramadol interference.

Adeolu O Adegoke, Alexandria N Jackson, Sonia L La'ulu, Chelsie Anderson, Joseph W Rudolf, Jessica M Boyd, Kamisha L Johnson-Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adeolu O AdegokeDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States.
Alexandria N JacksonARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Sonia L La'uluARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Chelsie AndersonARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Joseph W RudolfDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States.
Jessica M BoydDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-8930
Kamisha L Johnson-DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7943-6784

Funding

ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of the Immunalysis Tapentadol 343 Urine Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) screening kit, focusing on the prevalence of false-positive results due to cross-reactivity with tramadol. Tapentadol is a dual-action analgesic, modulating μ-opioid receptors and inhibiting norepinephrine reuptake, while tramadol, a structurally related compound, is a weak μ-opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine/serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Cross-reactivity between these compounds can complicate urine drug screening results for adherence monitoring in chronic pain management. A total of 28 samples initially produced false-positive results for tapentadol BNl using the Immunalysis Tapentadol 343 Urine EIA screening kit. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to confirm the absence of tapentadol. Of the false-positive samples, 61% contained tramadol at concentrations below the manufacturer-reported cross-reactivity threshold of 60 000 ng/mL, indicating assay limitations in specificity. To address this issue, a newly reformulated Immunalysis Tapentadol 343UR Urine HEIA kit was evaluated for tramadol cross-reactivity. Upon retesting the 28 false-positive samples with the reformulated kit, no false positives were detected, with results consistent with LC-MS/MS confirmation. The rate of false-positive tapentadol screens in urine has substantially reduced since the implementation of the new tapentadol kit in routine testing. These findings demonstrate the importance of assay verification to assess cross-reactivity, particularly for structurally related compounds. The reformulated Immunalysis Tapentadol 343UR kit shows improved specificity, reducing false-positive rates and enhancing the accuracy of tapentadol detection in clinical and forensic toxicology applications.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPhenolsSubstance Abuse DetectionTapentadolTramadolChromatography, LiquidCross ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesTandem Mass SpectrometryAnalgesics, OpioidPhenolsTapentadolTramadol

Identifiers

PMID40587090
PMCPMC12842606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.