ReviewAnnals of African medicine2026
The Triglyceride-Glucose Index: A Novel Marker for Clinical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification.
Review in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index and vascular dementia in ICU patients with cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of age- and gender-specific reference intervals for the triglyceride-glucose index in a large Chinese healthy adult population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- The triglyceride-glucose index: updating evidence from clinical settings to molecular mechanisms in ageing-related cerebrovascular diseases.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide with a substantial economic burden. It is driven by the intricate pathophysiology of insulin resistance (IR), which has been shown to disrupt glucose and lipid metabolism, vascular function, and drive inflammatory pathways, further accelerating the development and progression of CVD. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, which was first proposed in 2008, has demonstrated strong correlations with the more traditional markers reserved for research settings, namely the hyperglycemic-euglycemic clamp and the homeostatic model assessment of IR. Studies have shown that the TyG index independently predicts cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals, supporting its potential as a practical tool for cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with or without known metabolic disorders and those that existing risk stratification models would otherwise miss. Several randomized control trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses performed to date have identified the value of this index in identifying coronary artery calcification, acute coronary syndromes, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events and heart failure risk. In this summative review, we explore how incorporating the TyG index into general clinical practice would help identify high-risk individuals more effectively and earlier in the course of their disease, and consequently improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.