Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587037›Full record

ArticleMonash bioethics review2026

Teaching and learning medical humanities in medical school: a student's perspective on professional practice curriculum in Australia.

Matthew Melhem, Vinita Rane, Charlotte Denniston, George P Drewett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Monash bioethics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew MelhemMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. mmelhem@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Vinita RaneMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Charlotte DennistonMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
George P DrewettMelbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. george.drewett@nh.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing integration of the medical humanities in medical school curricula highlights its importance in the development of culturally safe, patient-centred clinicians. Internationally, medical schools attempt to increase student engagement through course electives, different modes of assessment and diverse content delivery. At the University of Melbourne, the Professional Practice program aims to provide an easy, engaging way of exposing students to the medical humanities, including reflective practice, collaborative practice, leadership, advocacy, professional identity formation, medical ethics and law. However, students' perceptions of the medical humanities may prevent desired outcomes from being reached. We discuss the student experience of the Professional Practice curriculum through a collaboration between a student, tutor and course designers focusing on student engagement and perspectives of the program. Overall, students felt uncomfortable with the flexibility and ambiguity of the medical humanities when compared to the rigidity of biomedical knowledge. Additionally, modes of assessment typically used in the humanities such as reflective writing were found to be unpopular. Students' involvement in the co-facilitation of classes helped develop communication skills and leadership but overall participation was still dependent on individual factors. Ultimately, the medical school and student body must work together to develop a medical humanities curriculum that is both complementary and viewed as of equal importance to the clinical curriculum.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumanitiesProfessional PracticeStudents, MedicalAcademiaAustraliaEthics, MedicalHumansLearningSchools, MedicalTeachingCurriculum developmentMedical educationMedical humanitiesProfessional practiceStudent perspective

Identifiers

PMID40587037
PMCPMC13526103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.