ArticleSystematic parasitology2025
Systematic revision of the genus Orchidasma Looss, 1900 and description of Orchidasma orchilobata n. sp. from the loggerhead Caretta caretta (L.) and Kemp's ridley Lepidochelys kempii (Garman) turtles.
Article in Systematic parasitology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult flukes of the genus Orchidasma were collected from the intestinal tracts of loggerhead Caretta caretta and Kemp's ridley Lepidochelys kempii sea turtles as part of diagnostic investigations into sea turtle strandings. Two morphologically distinct species were present: one represented the type-species Orchidasma amphiorchis and an undescribed species. Orchidasma amphiorchis is redescribed and Orchidasma orchilobata n. sp. is described based on morphological, molecular and phylogenetic analyses. Oxford Nanopore Technology and Illumina sequencing were used to generate complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear ribosomal operons for both species. Sanger sequencing from additional hologenophore specimens for both species were used to assess interspecific and intraspecific variability. Single locus phylogenetic analyses of aligned partial 28S rRNA gene sequences and concatenation of mitochondrial genes of the two species and other trematodes were performed to assess the taxonomic affinity of Orchidasma. Analysis of partial 28S rRNA gene sequences placed O. amphiorchis and O. orchilobata n. sp. as members of the Monorchioidea and closest to Skrjabinopsolus nudidorsalis, a member of Deropristidae. This disagreed with previous inclusion of Orchidasma as a member of Telorchiidae within Plagiorchioidea. Whole mitochondrial genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis resulted in similar topology, suggesting a revision to include Orchidasma as a member of Deropristidae supported by shared morphological characters and nucleotide sequence data with deropristid congeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40587010What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.