ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Toward accurate estimation of respiratory rate from the photoplethysmogram: effect of different window period of PPG signals.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Monitoring in Motion: An Overview of Wearable Methods and Algorithmic Approaches for Reliable Assessment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Parameter-Efficient Deep Learning Models for Vital Sign Estimation From PPG.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiration Rate (RR) is a crucial physiological measure for evaluating health and detecting early signs of respiratory distress in both clinical and home settings. Traditional RR estimation methods often require specialized equipment, whereas photoplethysmography (PPG) is a noninvasive and cost-effective alternative. However, noise interference and signal quality variations pose challenges in accurately estimating RR from PPG signals. This study proposes an enhanced method that improves the accuracy and robustness of estimation by optimizing the temporal window for segmentation and integrating preprocessing techniques, such as Chebyshev filtering and signal quality indices (SQI).This approach determines the optimal window sizes for precise RR calculation from PPG signals. To validate its effectiveness, the proposed method was evaluated on two datasets: the in-house TMCH dataset and the publicly available BIDMC dataset. On the BIDMC dataset, comprising 53 patients, the method achieved a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 2.07 bpm and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.95 bpm using a 120-second window. In the TMCH dataset, which included 524 participants, a 40-second window yielded an RMSE of 0.93 bpm and an MAE of 0.73 bpm. The results highlight the importance of selecting the optimal window size to balance accuracy and real-time performance for continuous and accurate RR estimation. The codes used during the research work are available at link: https://github.com/Ganz2077/Respiration-Rate-Estimation-using-PPG-Signals-and-Windows-Effect .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40586998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.