ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Novel non-invasive intrarenal pressure monitoring devices in flexible ureteroscopy: an in-vitro comparative study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated irrigation systems in mitigating laser-induced temperature during simulated ureteroscopy.BJU international · 2026Article
- Paradigm shifts in fluid management using suction irrigation pressure autoregulating systems in modern flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction access sheath: an evidence-based narrative from EAU Endourology.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Real-world DISS practice combined with and without access sheath: insights from the global DISS dataset: a EAU endourology study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- The future of endourology is now.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
- Editorial: Prevention and treatment of urolithiasis: innovation and novel techniques.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Two cost-effective techniques for intrarenal pressure monitoring during flexible ureteroscopy: validation of a handheld pressure meter against a sphygmomanometer in a bench-top model.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Establishing an AI-based artifact correction system for intrarenal pressure monitoring using the LithoVue™ Elite ureteroscope: an EAU endourology and AUSET collaboration : Author list.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntrarenal pressure monitoring is emerging as an important tool in flexible ureteroscopy. Novel non-invasive intrarenal pressure monitoring devices are introduced. We evaluated the pressure readings simultaneously across four novel non-invasive intrarenal pressure monitoring devices against the urodynamic system. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo IRP monitoring single-use flexible ureteroscopy: LithoVue Elite
resultsThe degree of agreement between measurements from urodynamic system and the experimented device was demonstrated by Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Compared to the urodynamic system, the average difference ± standard deviation of LithoVue Elite™ was 0.26 ± 1.75mmHg; ZebraScope™ 3.22 ± 1.86mHg, i-MIMERsys™ 0.96 ± 2.26mmhg; Tidor™ 1.09 ± 2.57mmHg. Pressure measured by LithoVue Elite™, ZebraScope™, i-MIMERsys™ and Tidor™ to urodynamic system showed excellent ICCs of 0.975 (p < 0.001), 0.915(p = 0.016), 0.955(p < 0.001) and 0.937(p < 0.001) respectively.
conclusionPressure recordings from four novel non-invasive intrarenal monitoring devices, namely flexible ureteroscopes-LithoVue Elite
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.