ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025
Screening and Needs Assessment Tools for Palliative Care in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Narrative Review.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deactivation of Cardiac Devices at the End of Life: Clinical and Ethical Challenges.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThere is a growing need for palliative care (PC) among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), as population ageing and technological progress bolster the numbers of patients living with chronic forms of CVD. RECENT
findingsPC can provide support and benefits in areas that are not necessarily addressed by medical therapy. However, many healthcare providers, and cardiologists in particular, struggle with identifying the right time to introduce PC in the care trajectory of patients with CVD, especially in heart failure, where the clinical course is punctuated by highs and lows, with periods of stability that may last several months to years. The use of validated assessment tools to recognize PC needs of people living with CVD is recommended, but clinicians may be unaware of existing instruments and criteria for PC referral, or when and how to use them. We report here a narrative review of the literature, with the aim of providing an overview of useful tools for the identification and assessment of palliative care needs among patients suffering from cardiovascular disease with a view to improving their care process. We further discuss the overall suitability of available tools, as well as issues specifically related to implantable cardiac devices at the end-of-life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40586972What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.