Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586956›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025

In the genetics of the beholder: gene-environment interplay for internalising and externalising behaviours using polygenic scores and adolescent perceptions of parenting.

Nisa R Rainy, Emma Meaburn, Bonamy R Oliver, Marthe de Roo, Tina Kretschmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nisa R RainyCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, 33 Torrington Square, London, WC1E 7JL, UK. nrainy01@student.bbk.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0614-334X
Emma MeaburnCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, 33 Torrington Square, London, WC1E 7JL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8096-9089
Bonamy R OliverDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-5482
Marthe de RooFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2769-5896
Tina KretschmerFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-9285

Funding

European Council Consolidator Grant 101087395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent internalising and externalising behaviours arise from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Understanding how parents' genes affect risk for psychopathology in offspring-whether through direct genetic transmission or environmentally mediated genetic nurture-is crucial for identifying causal mechanisms and intervention targets. However, few studies have examined this interplay rigorously in relation to adolescent psychopathology, and findings to date have remained mixed. To tackle this gap in research, we examined both genetic transmission and genetic nurture pathways using polygenic risk for psychopathology on adolescent internalising and externalising behaviours.The sample comprised 762 genotyped parent-offspring trios from the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). Parent and offspring polygenic scores for genetic liability to general psychopathology (p-PGS) were computed and jointly modelled to estimate genetically transmitted and genetic nurture contributions to parental reports of offspring internalising and externalising behaviours at age 11.Our findings indicate that parental polygenic risk for genetic liability to general psychopathology (captured as parental p-PGS) was associated with adolescent internalising-but not externalising-behaviours. Primarily this association was via environmental rather than direct genetic pathways, providing support for genetic nurture (b = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.05/0.22, q-value = 0.004). However, we found no association between parental p-PGS and adolescent-reported parenting behaviours, limiting our ability to assess whether genetic nurture effects for internalising problems were mediated by adolescent perspectives of parenting.The study highlights the importance of genetic nurture's influence on internalising behaviours, and encourages the consideration of genetic influences on perceptions of environmental influences that may be key.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorGene-Environment InteractionMental DisordersMultifactorial InheritanceParentingAdolescentChildFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleParentsExternalisingGenetic nurtureIntergenerational transmissionInternalisingPolygenic scorePsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID40586956
PMCPMC12743030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.