SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Perioperative outcomes of the SHURUI single-port robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Applying Robot-Assisted Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Technological Paradigm Innovations and Clinical Advances].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy of the Chinese surgical robotic system (EDGE MP1000 & MP2000) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single high-volume center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Pediatric choledochal cysts on a single-incision robotic surgical platform: a non-randomized pilot study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comment on: "Perioperative outcomes of the SHURUI single-port robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis" by Li and Luo.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to systematically assess the perioperative safety, procedural feasibility, and early clinical efficacy of the SHURUI single-port robotic system in diverse urological operations by conducting a single-arm meta-analysis. An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to retrieve relevant studies involving SHURUI-assisted urologic surgeries, such as radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, and pyeloplasty. Key perioperative indicators-operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospitalization, and early functional outcomes-were extracted and synthesized using a random-effects model for pooled analysis. A total of 130 patients from multiple single-center studies were included. The SHURUI system demonstrated low intraoperative complication rates, minimal blood loss, and no conversions to open or laparoscopic surgery. For radical prostatectomy, the mean console time was approximately 172 min, and continence recovery within one month approached 50%. Partial nephrectomy cases showed acceptable warm ischemia times and no positive surgical margins. Pyeloplasty achieved a near-complete success rate in both pediatric and adult patients. Across procedures, postoperative pain scores and hospitalization durations were favorable. This meta-analysis indicates that the SHURUI single-port robotic platform appears to be a safe and feasible option for various urologic procedures, even in its initial stages of clinical adoption. The observed perioperative and short-term outcomes are preliminary but suggest potential clinical applicability. However, given the limited scope and non-comparative nature of the current evidence, further high-quality studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate its long-term safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40586932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.