ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
AutoPM3: enhancing variant interpretation via LLM-driven PM3 evidence extraction from scientific literature.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on the generative AI applications in human medical genetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Genetics: Current Applications and Challenges.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Implementing generative artificial intelligence in precision oncology: safety, governance, and significance.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRare diseases affect over 300 million people worldwide and are often caused by genetic variants. While variant detection has become cost-effective, interpreting these variants-particularly collecting literature-based evidence like ACMG/AMP PM3-remains complex and time-consuming.
resultsWe present AutoPM3, a method that automates PM3 evidence extraction from literatures using open-source large language models (LLMs). AutoPM3 combines a Text2SQL-based variant extractor and a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) module, enhanced by a variant-specific retriever and fine-tuned LLM, to separately process tables and text. We curated PM3-Bench, a dataset of 1027 variant-publication evidence pairs from ClinGen. On openly accessible pairs, AutoPM3 achieved 86.1% accuracy for variant hits and 72.5% recall for in trans variants-outperforming other methods, including those using larger models. We uncovered the effectiveness of AutoPM3's key modules, especially for variant-specific retriever and Text2SQL, through the sequential ablation study. AutoPM3 located evidence in 76 s, demonstrating that open-source LLMs can offer an efficient, cost-effective solution for rare disease diagnosis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: AutoPM3 is implemented and freely available under the MIT license at https://github.com/HKU-BAL/AutoPM3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.