Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586902›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Comparative analysis of osteoporotic versus pathologic fracture in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Jiwon Park, Ji-Won Kim, Jin Hyun Nam, Youngjune Kim, Jin Won Kim, Suin Kang, Yejee Lim, Kyungim Kim, Keun-Wook Lee

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiwon Park *College of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-Ro, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Won Kim *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hyun NamDivision of Big Data Science, Korea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Youngjune KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jin Won KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suin KangCollege of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-Ro, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea.
Yejee LimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. glide11@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3540-0202
Kyungim KimCollege of Pharmacy, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-Ro, Sejong, 30019, Republic of Korea. kim_ki@korea.ac.kr.
Keun-Wook LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund 09-2022-0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, the incidence rate of osteoporotic fracture (OF) was comparable to that of pathologic fracture (4.5% vs 4.2% over 2 years), and even higher in those aged ≥ 70. Because age and osteoporosis are significant risk factors, assessing osteoporosis is critical to prevent OF in older mCRC patients. PURPOSE: Fractures in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have been reported; however, most of these are pathologic fractures (PFs). This study aimed to identify the incidence rates of and risk factors for osteoporotic fracture (OF) and PF.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of mCRC patients who received palliative chemotherapy.

resultsWe enrolled 622 patients (359 male) consecutively. The median patient age was 61 (range, 20-91) years. Before chemotherapy, 42 (6.8%) patients had bone metastases. During follow-up, 86 (13.8%) patients experienced 96 fracture events. The cumulative incidence rates over the 2-year period were 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-6.1%) and 4.2% (95% CI, 2.6-5.8%) for OF and PF, respectively. The crude incidence rate of OF was higher than that of PF in patients aged ≥ 70 years with an incidence rate ratio of 4.65 (95% CI, 1.72-15.7). Multivariable analysis identified older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.08]; p = 0.03) and osteoporosis (HR, 4.79 [95% CI, 1.51-15.16]; p = 0.01) as significant risk factors for OF after adjustment for bone and cancer-related variables. For PF, bone metastasis was a significant risk factor (HR, 9.48 [95% CI, 4.02-22.38]; p < 0.01).

conclusionsThe incidence rate of OF was comparable to that of PF and even higher in mCRC patients aged ≥ 70 years. While bone metastasis was a risk factor for PF, advanced age and osteoporosis were the risk factors for OF. Therefore, osteoporosis assessment and treatment are crucial to prevent OF during chemotherapy, particularly in the elderly.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFractures, SpontaneousOsteoporotic FracturesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEpidemiologyFracture risk assessmentOsteoporosisScreeningTumor-induced bone disease

Identifiers

PMID40586902
PMCPMC12612003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.