Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586820›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Toward Assay-Aware Bioactivity Model(er)s: Getting a Grip on Biological Context.

Linde Schoenmaker, Enzo G Sastrokarijo, Laura H Heitman, Joost B Beltman, Willem Jespers, Gerard J P van Westen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assay2Mol: Large Language Model-based Drug Design Using BioAssay Context.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linde SchoenmakerDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9879-1004
Enzo G SastrokarijoDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Laura H HeitmanDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1381-8464
Joost B BeltmanDivision of Cell Systems and Drug Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willem JespersDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-9220
Gerard J P van WestenDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-1817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-ligand interaction prediction with proteochemometric (PCM) models can provide valuable insights during early drug discovery and chemical safety assessment. These models have benefitted from the large amount of data available in bioactivity databases. However, an issue that is often overlooked when using this data is the broad diversity in the biological assays present. The effect of small molecules on a protein can be measured in various ways, and this can influence the outcome. Yet, currently there is a lack of standardized, specific assay metadata, while this could help increase understanding of the origin of data points, improve data curation, and lead to better models that are both more accurate and make predictions specific to the readout of interest. To make use of the existing information on the biological context, we set out to create and validate multiple assay descriptors and test their use in protein-ligand interaction models. Dimensionality reduction of embedded free text assay descriptions from ChEMBL showed that text embeddings capture relevant features. Additionally, clustering of these embedded descriptions groups the assays in a way that enriches purity, matches manually categorized assays, and yields sensible topic describing words. From ligand-protein combinations with multiple measurements, it becomes apparent that the deviation between different measurements in general is higher than the deviation of measurements within assay categories, with a logarithmic mean absolute deviation of 0.83 and 0.66, respectively. Incorporating this biological context into the PCM models in the form of BioBERT-based embeddings improved the average

Indexed as

Biological AssayProteinsDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID40586820
PMCPMC12264928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.