Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586806›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].

Heide Weishaar, Anna Kuehne, Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Hajo Zeeb

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heide WeishaarRobert Koch-Institut, Gerichtstr. 27, 13347, Berlin, Deutschland. weishaarh@rki.de.
Anna KuehneProfessur Öffentliche Gesundheit, Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Kayvan BozorgmehrFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, AG Bevölkerungsmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Hajo ZeebLeibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie BIPS, Bremen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of high-quality, evidence-based practice to improve the health of populations is a prerequisite and a core element of public health. However, gaps frequently exist between research and practice, leading to the underuse of effective interventions and misuse of inappropriate interventions. Implementation science aims to bridge the gap between knowledge production and implementation by generating evidence to improve the transfer of research findings and evidence-based practices into routine action. This discussion article reflects on the state of implementation science in Germany. First, we provide a descriptive classification of implementation science, followed by a review of selected theories, models, and frameworks that are used in implementation research to systematically analyze implementation strategies, barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of interventions. Subsequently, implementation science in Germany is examined with regard to specific projects, institutional integration, teaching, and networking among experts. The article concludes with a critical reflection on the limitations and potential of implementation science for public health in Germany.An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as Supplementary Information.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Services ResearchImplementation SciencePublic HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalForecastingGermanyHumansEvidenceGermanyHealth care researchImplementation researchImplementation science theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs)

Identifiers

PMID40586806
PMCPMC12254172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.