ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of high-quality, evidence-based practice to improve the health of populations is a prerequisite and a core element of public health. However, gaps frequently exist between research and practice, leading to the underuse of effective interventions and misuse of inappropriate interventions. Implementation science aims to bridge the gap between knowledge production and implementation by generating evidence to improve the transfer of research findings and evidence-based practices into routine action. This discussion article reflects on the state of implementation science in Germany. First, we provide a descriptive classification of implementation science, followed by a review of selected theories, models, and frameworks that are used in implementation research to systematically analyze implementation strategies, barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of interventions. Subsequently, implementation science in Germany is examined with regard to specific projects, institutional integration, teaching, and networking among experts. The article concludes with a critical reflection on the limitations and potential of implementation science for public health in Germany.An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as Supplementary Information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.