Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586725›Full record

ArticleZoo biology

Impacts of Chopped Food on Primate Behavior Are Not Clear Cut. A Case Study on Zoo-Housed Ring-Tailed Lemurs.

Adam J George, Samuel Tull, Paul Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam J GeorgeSchool of Sciences, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK.
Samuel TullUniversity Centre Somerset, Bridgwater & Taunton College, Somerset, UK.
Paul RoseCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Psychology, University of Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-8267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring how food presentation influences behavior helps encourage practices that support natural foraging efforts for species housed in zoos. To test the effect of food presentation on a commonly housed zoo primate, observations of the behavior of ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), housed at Tropiquaria Zoo in the UK, were undertaken to analyze how different food presentation conditions elicited variation in activity budgets, positive behavioral diversity, and performance of foraging behavior. Lemur behaviors were analyzed in relation to two food presentation conditions (chopped produce and whole produce) using a Shannon's Diversity Index (H-index) adapted for behavioral data. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to investigate whether factors including weather, temperature, and visitor presence had an impact on foraging behavior or if food presentation style was the most important factor. Higher rates of foraging and exploration (locomotion) were observed when lemurs were fed chopped food, whereas animals spent more time eating and performing maintenance behaviors when provided with whole food. There was no significant difference in calculated positive behavioral diversity between chopped and whole food. Food presentation style and weather conditions were important influences of time spent foraging, but temperature and visitor presence had no effect. Our findings show how other influencing factors, alongside of food presentation style, are likely to affect how zoo animals engage with, and ultimately consume, the diet they are offered. We suggest that providing zoo-housed lemurs with both chopped and whole food items is likely to promote a range of natural foraging behaviors and enhance overall animal welfare outputs.

Indexed as

Animals, ZooBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorLemurAnimal HusbandryAnimalsFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleactivity budgetsbehavioral diversityfood presentationforaging behaviorring‐tailed lemurs

Identifiers

PMID40586725
PMCPMC12513129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.