ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
Recurrence After Gallbladder Cancer Resection: Prognostic Impact of CA19-9 and CEA Levels at Baseline and During Surveillance.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBaseline serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels may predict prognosis among patients undergoing resection for gallbladder cancer (GBC), yet the prognostic utility of the combination of the two markers has not been well established. In addition, the prognostic significance of elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels that normalize after GBC resection is currently unknown.
methodsPatients undergoing resection of GBC between 2002 and 2021 were identified using an international, multi-institutional database. The association of preoperative CA19-9 and CEA levels with recurrence-free survival (RFS) following GBC resection was assessed. The negative predictive value (NPV) of normal vs. normalized (high preoperative/low postoperative levels) CA19-9 levels relative to the development of recurrence within 1 year after GBC resection was evaluated.
resultsAmong 194 patients who underwent resection of GBC, median preoperative CA19-9 and CEA levels were 18.8 U/mL (IQR 7.0-88.0) and 2.2 ng/mL (IQR 1.3-3.8), respectively. A total of 92 (47.4%) and 67 (34.5%) patients had elevated CA19-9 (> 20 U/mL) and CEA (> 3 ng/mL) levels before GBC resection, respectively. Individuals with low CA19-9/low CEA had the most favorable 3-year RFS (74.5%) after GBC resection followed by individuals with either high CA19-9 (high CA19-9/low CEA: 41.6%) or high CEA (low CA19-9/high CEA: 60.9%) levels, whereas patients with high CA19-9/high CEA had the worst 3-year RFS (21.5%) following GBC resection (p < 0.001). Patients with normal preoperative CA19-9 levels had better 3-year RFS than patients with high preoperative CA19-9 levels that normalized after resection (74.6% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.03). While the NPV of normal preoperative CA19-9 levels relative to the development of recurrence within 1 year after GBC resection was 94.7%, the NPV of normalized CA19-9 decreased to 70% at 1-year post-resection.
conclusionElevation of both preoperative CA19-9 and CEA levels portended poor prognosis following resection of GBC. Normalization of postoperative CA19-9 levels after GBC resection was still associated with elevated risk of recurrence. While preoperative tumor markers can accurately predict prognosis following resection for GBC, evaluation of traditional tumor markers may not be appropriate markers of occult recurrent disease in the postoperative setting. Better markers are needed to monitor for recurrence following resection of GBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.