ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Assessment of Diffractive Intraocular Lenses Using Near-Infrared Light: A Critical Evaluation.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Basic Optics Underlying Current Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: After cataract surgery, near-infrared (NIR) light-based optical devices are commonly used for in vivo vision quality assessment, using wavefront sensors and double-pass techniques. This study investigates the diffraction efficiencies and orders of the AT LISA tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Berlin, Germany) under visible and NIR illumination, highlighting challenges in using NIR-based devices to evaluate diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: This study uses an optical bench system to generate in vitro through focus intensity data and compares the results to an optics simulation using the manufacturer's theoretically designed diffractive surface topography of the investigated trifocal IOL instead of possibly error-prone measured topography data. Results: For visible light, through-focus curve intensities and energy efficiencies behaved as expected. However, under NIR light, near and intermediate foci showed significantly reduced intensities compared to the far focus. Energy efficiency measurements indicate suboptimal performance of the near and intermediate foci with NIR light. Under these conditions, the investigated trifocal IOL became almost monofocal. Conclusions: The study demonstrates the wavelength-dependent behavior of the diffractive IOL, emphasizing the risks of inaccurate assessments when using NIR-based devices. It highlights the need for visible-light-based techniques for accurate evaluation and the importance of using precise surface topography data in simulations. Translational Relevance: This research bridges the gap between basic research and clinical care by showing that vision assessments performed with NIR-light inaccurately evaluate diffractive IOLs, guiding clinicians toward visible-light techniques for accurate vision assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.