Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586549›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical economics2025

Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) in earlier detection of liver lesions in cirrhotic patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy.

L Maas, C Contreras-Meca, S Ghezzo, F Belmans, A Corsi, J Cant, W Vos, M Bobowicz, M Rygusik, D K Laski and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

L MaasRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-0712
C Contreras-MecaRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0002-2241-2260
S GhezzoRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-6759
F BelmansRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8944-6898
A CorsiRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3954-303X
J CantRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0772-252X
W VosRadiomics.bio, Liege, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-421X
M Bobowicz2nd Division of Radiology, Medical Univeristy of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3608-1960
M Rygusik2nd Division of Radiology, Medical Univeristy of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-6352-0927
D K LaskiDepartment of Oncological, Transplant and General Surgery, Medical Univeristy of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1177-4541
L AnnemansFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-7210
M HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-9258
EuCanImage Working Group
*EuCanImage Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Cirrhosis is a major contributing factor, accounting for over 90% of HCC cases. With the high mortality rate of HCC, earlier detection of HCC is critical. When added to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to improve HCC detection. Nonetheless, to date no cost-effectiveness analyses have been conducted on an AI tool to enhance earlier HCC detection. This study reports on the cost-effectiveness of detection of liver lesions with AI improved MRI in the surveillance for HCC in patients with a cirrhotic liver compared to usual care (UC).

methodsThe model structure included a decision tree followed by a state-transition Markov model from an Italian healthcare perspective. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were simulated in cirrhotic patients at risk of HCC. One-way sensitivity analyses and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).

resultsFor patients receiving UC, the average lifetime costs per 1,000 patients were €16,604,800 compared to €16,610,250 for patients receiving the AI approach. With a QALY gained of 0.55 and incremental costs of €5,000 for every 1,000 patients, the ICER was €9,888 per QALY gained, indicating cost-effectiveness with the willingness-to-pay threshold of €33,000/QALY gained. Main drivers of cost-effectiveness included the cost and performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the AI tool. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that an AI-based approach to detect HCC earlier in cirrhotic patients can be cost-effective. By incorporating cost-effective AI-based approaches in clinical practice, patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency are improved.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, HepatocellularEarly Detection of CancerLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDecision TreesFemaleHumansItalyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle Agedartificial intelligencecirrhosisCost-effectiveness analysisdecision treehepatocellular carcinomaI15I18MarkovO31O32

Identifiers

PMID40586549
PMCPMC12315843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.