ArticleJournal of medical economics2025
Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) in earlier detection of liver lesions in cirrhotic patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy.
Article in Journal of medical economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Value for Money of AI-Assisted Technologies for Older Adults: Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: a health economic evaluation.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Harnessing AI-driven approaches for detecting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, assessing fibrosis, and stratifying hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Hepatic enhancement and signal intensity analysis on magnetic resonance imaging as prognostic biomarkers in advanced chronic liver disease.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing gastrointestinal cancer research with artificial intelligence: From precision patient stratification to real-world evidence.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Performance of AI-based machine learning models for overall survival prediction in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immunoradiotherapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Cirrhosis is a major contributing factor, accounting for over 90% of HCC cases. With the high mortality rate of HCC, earlier detection of HCC is critical. When added to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to improve HCC detection. Nonetheless, to date no cost-effectiveness analyses have been conducted on an AI tool to enhance earlier HCC detection. This study reports on the cost-effectiveness of detection of liver lesions with AI improved MRI in the surveillance for HCC in patients with a cirrhotic liver compared to usual care (UC).
methodsThe model structure included a decision tree followed by a state-transition Markov model from an Italian healthcare perspective. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were simulated in cirrhotic patients at risk of HCC. One-way sensitivity analyses and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).
resultsFor patients receiving UC, the average lifetime costs per 1,000 patients were €16,604,800 compared to €16,610,250 for patients receiving the AI approach. With a QALY gained of 0.55 and incremental costs of €5,000 for every 1,000 patients, the ICER was €9,888 per QALY gained, indicating cost-effectiveness with the willingness-to-pay threshold of €33,000/QALY gained. Main drivers of cost-effectiveness included the cost and performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the AI tool. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that an AI-based approach to detect HCC earlier in cirrhotic patients can be cost-effective. By incorporating cost-effective AI-based approaches in clinical practice, patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency are improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.